Social media hails Palki Sharma’s stand as “fearless journalism for national interest.”
New Delhi, June 7, 2025 — In a powerful and widely circulated exchange, senior journalist Palki Sharma confronted New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon over his government's perceived inaction against Khalistani elements operating on New Zealand soil. The moment occurred during an international press interaction and has since sparked intense debate online and in diplomatic circles.
The Exchange That Went Viral
When asked about the rising pro-Khalistan activities and anti-India demonstrations taking place in New Zealand, Palki posed a pointed question:
“How do you propose to address the Khalistani elements operating in your country?”
Prime Minister Luxon responded with a measured diplomatic stance:
“We believe in freedom of speech.”
But Palki Sharma quickly countered with a sharp retort that drew global attention:
“If Al-Qaeda or ISIS had asked for a referendum in New Zealand, would you have said the same?”
The direct comparison between pro-Khalistani activism and globally designated terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda and ISIS was seen by many as a brutal takedown of the oft-used "freedom of expression" defense when dealing with extremist or separatist rhetoric.
India’s Growing Concern Over Khalistani Activities Abroad
India has repeatedly raised concerns with countries like Canada, the UK, Australia, and New Zealand over the increasing visibility and organization of Khalistani sympathizers. These groups have been accused of glorifying terrorism, vandalizing Indian diplomatic missions, and threatening Indian diaspora communities.
The issue has become a diplomatic flashpoint in recent years, especially after incidents such as the vandalism of Indian High Commission properties and open calls for violence by fringe groups operating under the guise of "referendum campaigns."
Global Debate: Where to Draw the Line?
Palki’s question has reignited the global debate on the limits of freedom of speech, particularly when it begins to border on hate speech, incitement to violence, or promotion of separatism in foreign democracies.
Critics argue that Western democracies, while championing free expression, often fail to take timely action against radical elements that openly threaten other sovereign nations. Others, however, maintain that freedom of speech is non-negotiable and that it is up to law enforcement to act only when speech leads to clear and present danger.
Social Media Reactions and Public Support
Palki Sharma’s bold stance has earned her widespread support on Indian social media platforms, with many hailing her as a voice of national interest who isn't afraid to challenge world leaders on uncomfortable truths.
Hashtags like #PalkiSharma, #KhalistanExposed, and #IndiaFirst trended across X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, and YouTube shortly after the video clip was posted.
Conclusion
As separatist movements seek shelter under the shield of free expression abroad, India continues to urge nations to draw a clearer distinction between activism and extremism. Palki Sharma’s exchange with the New Zealand PM may be a turning point in global discourse on where that line should be drawn.
